FBI’s Kash Patel faces hearings over Charlie Kirk case errors

FBI Director Kash Patel is set to face tough questioning in U.S. congressional hearings this week after his handling of the Charlie Kirk murder investigation drew sharp criticism, including from his own conservative allies.

Patel will appear before both the Senate and House judiciary committees on Tuesday and Wednesday. Lawmakers are expected to press him not only about the FBI’s missteps in the Kirk case but also about his ability to lead an agency shaken by political battles and internal discord.

The controversy centers on Patel’s premature announcement on social media that the suspect in Kirk’s killing was in custody — a claim that later proved false. The error fueled questions about his judgment at a time when the bureau’s credibility is under strain.

Trump backs Patel

President Donald Trump praised Patel for swiftly identifying the alleged assassin, Tyler Robinson. But that endorsement did not silence growing doubts within conservative ranks.

Christopher F. Rufo of the Manhattan Institute wrote on X that Republicans must reconsider Patel’s suitability to lead the FBI. He argued Patel “performed terribly in the last few days” and lacked the operational expertise to counter violent movements across the political spectrum.

Conservative commentator Erick Erickson echoed these concerns, writing, “The FBI situation is concerning.”

Missteps fuel criticism

During the investigation, Patel posted that “the subject” in Kirk’s killing was in custody. Hours later, he reversed course, saying the individual had been released. Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin dismissed the blunder as “amateur hour,” casting doubts on Patel’s professionalism.

According to reports, Patel also lashed out at FBI staff for not keeping him updated and for failing to provide him a photo of the suspected shooter quickly.

Legal challenges complicate Patel’s position

Adding to Patel’s challenges, he faces a lawsuit from three senior FBI executives fired in an August purge, which they claim was politically motivated. One plaintiff, Brian Driscoll, a former acting FBI director, said he was dismissed after resisting leadership’s push to terminate an agent wrongly linked online to the Mar-a-Lago documents probe.

The legal case has further fueled criticism that Patel is pursuing political grievances instead of focusing on law enforcement priorities.

Patel has also been scrutinized for realigning FBI resources toward illegal immigration and street crime, while critics argue this has sidelined critical national security and counterintelligence missions.

Former FBI congressional affairs chief Gregory Brower noted Patel must perform exceptionally well in the hearings to ease senators’ skepticism.